Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP

Specialists in UK immigration and nationality law

Call 020 7401 6887
contact@gryklaw.com

  • Home
  • Our work
    • Adoption, Surrogacy, and Children
    • Asylum
    • British Citizenship
    • Challenging Home Office Decisions
    • Couples & Families
    • Europeans
    • Global Talent
    • Private Life
    • Settlement (Indefinite Leave)
    • Sponsored Work
    • Students
    • Visitors
    • Other Categories
  • Our team
  • Our fees
  • News and updates
  • Contact us
    • Map and directions
    • Make an enquiry
    • Complaints
    • Vacancies

Asylum claims by gay, lesbian and bisexual Bangladeshis: the changing Home Office position

5th December 2017 By Nath Gbikpi

The attitude of the Home Office towards asylum claims made by Bangladeshi nationals on the basis of their sexual identity has changed over the years.

Until approximately mid-2016, it seems that the Home Office accepted that gay, lesbian and bisexual people were at risk of harm in Bangladesh. This meant that many were granted asylum.

Since mid-2016, however, we have seen a lot of refusals on the basis that gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals are not at risk of harm in Bangladesh. The Home Office says that they are discriminated against, but they are not persecuted (seriously harmed), and that the state will protect them.

In December 2016, and again in September 2017, the Home Office published a Policy and Information Note on Bangladesh which made this clear. The Note from September said that:

in general the treatment of LGBT persons in Bangladesh, even when taken cumulatively, is not sufficiently serious by its nature and repetition as to amount to persecution or serious harm”;

and that

effective state protection against societal ill-treatment may be available depending on the facts of the case”.

A group of lawyers and other stakeholders, including myself, wrote to the Home Office to ask them to reconsider their Note. We explained that the evidence showed that LGBT persons in Bangladesh are at risk of serious harm.

As a result, in November 2017, a new Note was published. This time, the policy summary says that:

In general, an LGBT person who does not conceal their sexual orientation or gender identity may be at risk of treatment, which by its nature and repetition amounts to persecution or serious harm” and that “the state appears able but unwilling to offer effective protection”.

This new Note is a move in the right direction. We are hoping that decision makers will now find it harder to refuse asylum claims by gay, lesbian and bisexual Bangladeshi nationals who want to live an openly gay life in Bangladesh, but would not do so because they are scared of being harmed.

However, some points from the Policy and Information Note are still concerning and misleading. For example, the Note says that “the available evidence does not establish that LGBT persons are systematically targeted and subject to treatment amounting to persecution or serious harm by the state”. Whether there is systematic targeting is not the issue. The Home Office should look at whether, if they went back to Bangladesh, LGBT persons would be at risk of harm, and I would say they are.

Similarly, the notes have consistently stressed that the Bangladeshi police and government do not use section 377 of the Penal Code, which criminalises same-sex sexual acts, to arrest LGBT persons. This is true, however that is not the point. The rest of the evidence shows that LGBT persons are at risk of harm and the state will not protect them. That is the test to apply when deciding asylum claims.

I was at the Upper Tribunal on 28 November for a gay man from Bangladesh. The Home Office accepted that he was gay but they continued to say that the evidence on Bangladesh does not show that he will necessarily be at risk of harm. Therefore, the new Policy and Information Note is still used to argue that Bangladesh is safe. This is why we will continue to push the Home Office to review it.

Thankfully for my client, the Upper Tribunal judge agreed with us and he won his appeal. I have had two other successes at the First-Tier Tribunal for Bangladeshi gay men in the last year. However, we would like the Home Office to accept that Bangladeshi LGBT persons are at risk of harm, without them having to go to court.

In the meantime, if you are LGBT, from Bangladesh, currently in the UK, and you fear for your life were you to be returned to Bangladesh, you should get legal advice as you may have a good asylum claim. Please do contact us to arrange a consultation by phone or by email.

Filed Under: News and Updates


The Legal 500 – The Clients Guide to Law Firms
Top Ranked Chambers UK 2022
Listed as one of The Times’ Best Law Firms 2022

Wesley Gryk LLP Follow

A specialist private immigration practice. Band 1 rated by Chambers and Partners and Legal500

WesleyGrykLLP
Retweet on Twitter Wesley Gryk LLP Retweeted
grykunplugged WesleyGrykUnplugged @grykunplugged ·
27 Jun

To mark Pride Month, the U.S. Presidential Scholars Foundation (PSF) published today in The Medallion, their monthly newsletter, excerpts from - and a link to - an essay I’ve written, 50+ Years a Gay Man: A Personal Life in a Historical Context. https://mailchi.mp/presidentialscholars/june2022.

Reply on Twitter 1541503277711360000 Retweet on Twitter 1541503277711360000 1 Like on Twitter 1541503277711360000 6 Twitter 1541503277711360000
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
4 Jul

We are so pleased today to have submitted Trent’s application to register as a BOTC and British citizen following recent changes to the law.

Well done to the @BOTCCAMPAIGN for their work in highlighting the historic injustice for children of BOTC parents!

Home Office @ukhomeoffice

We've launched new routes to nationality for those affected by historical anomalies, including for British Overseas Territories citizens.

This will help people like Trent, who is now able to apply for both British overseas territories citizenship & British citizenship.

Reply on Twitter 1543982078785626115 Retweet on Twitter 1543982078785626115 3 Like on Twitter 1543982078785626115 10 Twitter 1543982078785626115
Retweet on Twitter Wesley Gryk LLP Retweeted
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
16 Jun

We are hiring!

We are looking to hire two paralegals! Deadline for applications is Sunday 3rd July 2022.

Find out more about the role, including how to apply, here: http://gryklaw.com/vacancies/

Reply on Twitter 1537467213518671872 Retweet on Twitter 1537467213518671872 3 Like on Twitter 1537467213518671872 1 Twitter 1537467213518671872
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
28 Jun

Congratulations to Wesley Gryk alum @IlonaBannister on the publication of 'Little Prisons', her second published novel!

We are very proud!

Reply on Twitter 1541709942876508160 Retweet on Twitter 1541709942876508160 1 Like on Twitter 1541709942876508160 5 Twitter 1541709942876508160
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
23 Jun

Amongst a swathe of changes to the Immigration Rules on Monday, 20 June 2022, was the introduction of 2 new routes to ILR on the basis of private life which will benefit children born in the UK and young adults.

Our Andrew Jones (@andrewijones) explains: https://www.gryklaw.com/home-office-introduces-two-new-private-life-routes-to-ilr/

Reply on Twitter 1540002444154966021 Retweet on Twitter 1540002444154966021 1 Like on Twitter 1540002444154966021 3 Twitter 1540002444154966021
Load More
Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP
140 Lower Marsh, London SE1 7AE
Tel 020 7401 6887
Email contact@gryklaw.com

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with number OC317684. Our registered office is at 140 Lower Marsh, London, SE1 7AE. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA ID 446311.

Copyright © 2022 · Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP · Website by Culpepper & Co · Photography by Sarah Booker

.