Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP

Specialists in UK immigration and nationality law

Call 020 7401 6887
contact@gryklaw.com

  • Home
  • Our work
    • Adoption, Surrogacy, and Children
    • Asylum
    • British Citizenship
    • Challenging Home Office Decisions
    • Couples & Families
    • Europeans
    • Global Talent
    • Private Life
    • Settlement (Indefinite Leave)
    • Sponsored Work
    • Students
    • Visitors
    • Other Categories
  • Our team
  • Our fees
  • News and updates
  • Contact us
    • Map and directions
    • Make an enquiry
    • Complaints
    • Vacancies

Further changes to calculating “continuous residence” in the UK for indefinite leave to remain

11th October 2018 By wesleygryk

In January 2018, the Home Office brought in significant changes to the way in which “continuous residence” is calculated for the purpose of applications for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) in certain work categories including Tier 1, Tier 2, UK Ancestry and Representatives of an Overseas Business. You can find details in my earlier blog post, here.

This current blog post is a summary of the further changes which came into force on 6 July 2018.  The advice in this blog is correct as of the date of publication, but – as demonstrated by this very issue – immigration law and procedures change very rapidly and we would urge readers always to check the current position before making an application to the Home Office.

The position pre-January 2018

In the past, continuous residence for applicants under the particular work categories listed above was considered unbroken where:

“the applicant has been absent from the UK for a period of 180 days or less in any of the five consecutive 12 month periods preceding the date of the application for leave to remain, except that any absence from the UK for the purpose of assisting with the Ebola crisis which began in West Africa in 2014 shall not count towards the 180 days…”

The position between January 2018 and July 2018

The changes of 11 January 2018, however, amended this definition so that continuous residence was instead considered unbroken where:

“the applicant has not been absent from the UK for more than 180 days during any 12 month period in the continuous period, except that any absence from the UK for the purpose of assisting with a national or international humanitarian or environmental crisis overseas shall not count towards the 180 days…”  

These changes were initially brought into force on 11 January 2018 with immediate effect, with no ‘grandfather clause’ or transitional provisions for people who had been relying on the previous rule, believing that it would continue to apply to them.

In addition to being impractical and unnecessarily harsh for the migrants affected, that change was also, in our opinion, unlawful with respect to those people who already had a relevant status and were relying on the old rule and now suddenly found that it did not apply, and that the way that they had been calculating their absences based upon the old rule might now prevent them from obtaining indefinite leave to remain.

The position since July 2018

On 6 July 2018, the Home Office amended the Immigration Rules relating to continuous residence again, this time for the better.

Perhaps anticipating forthcoming legal challenges to the retroactive nature of the changes, the Home Office introduced transitional arrangements and revised the Immigration Rules to state that, with respect to periods of entry clearance or leave to remain granted prior to 11 January 2018, the original rule of up to 180 days in the five consecutive 12 month periods would continue to apply, with the new rule only being applied to periods of leave granted after 11 January 2018.

The Home Office’s guidance of 6 July 2018 – which remains in force now (at the date of this blog) and which is available here – provides the following example for how absences are to be calculated for ILR applications:

“For settlement applications made from 11 January 2018, you must consider absences from the UK on a rolling basis, rather than in separate consecutive 12 month periods. If the applicants qualifying period includes leave granted before this date, any absences during that leave will be considered under the previous rules – in separate 12-month periods ending on the date of application.

For example: The application date is 30 June 2020. The applicant’s continuous period includes the following grants of leave:

  • one grant of leave from 1 July 2015 to 28 July 2018 – any absences during this grant of leave will be considered in separate 12-month periods, ending on 30 June each year
  • one grant of leave from 29 July 2018 to 30 June 2020 – any absences during this grant of leave will be considered on a rolling basis: you must not include any absences from the previous grant of leave when you assess this.”

I would urge anyone who had been expecting to qualify for ILR but who believed that they no longer qualified as a result of the changes to the Rules in January 2018, to look again at their absences, as they may qualify sooner than they thought.

For the sake of completeness, I note that the Home Office’s new guidance of 6 July 2018 continues to confirm that, in exceptional cases, ILR may be granted “outside the Rules” on a discretionary basis where the excess absences were due to “serious or compelling reasons”, but that work-related absences are not considered exceptional.

The position for dependent family members of Points Based System (PBS) migrants, including dependants of Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 4 (General) and Tier 5 (Temporary Worker) migrants, also remains the same as in my earlier blog post – namely, that absences from the UK during periods of leave granted before 11 January 2018 will not be taken into account, but for periods of leave granted after 11 January 2018, PBS dependants will be subject to the new Rules and will need to ensure that their absences do not exceed 180 days in any 12 month period.

One final point to note is that the guidance no longer provides that ILR can be granted outside the Rules on the basis that the changes have caused the applicant “exceptionally harsh consequences”; this exception has been removed since July, presumably as a result of the fact that there are now transitional provisions in force so applicants have been given notice of the new Rules.

Filed Under: Uncategorised


The Legal 500 – The Clients Guide to Law Firms
Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP
Listed as one of The Times’ Best Law Firms 2022

Wesley Gryk LLP Follow

A specialist private immigration practice. Band 1 rated by Chambers and Partners and Legal500

WesleyGrykLLP
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
26 Jan

In December 2022, the High Court ruled that the way the government is implementing the EU Settlement Scheme is unlawful.

Our Beatrice Windsor (@bearosewindsor) explains the judgement: https://www.gryklaw.com/high-court-rules-that-potential-loss-of-rights-for-those-with-pre-settled-status-under-euss-is-unlawful/

Reply on Twitter 1618634056031404032 Retweet on Twitter 1618634056031404032 1 Like on Twitter 1618634056031404032 3 Twitter 1618634056031404032
Retweet on Twitter Wesley Gryk LLP Retweeted
rainbowmigrants Rainbow Migration @rainbowmigrants ·
24 Jan

Our monthly partnership session went really well! Thank you so much to pro bono lawyers Karma Hickman
@BindmansLLP and Barry O'Leary @WesleyGrykLLP for their free advice to our #LGBTQ service users.🏳️‍🌈

Reply on Twitter 1617876748728782848 Retweet on Twitter 1617876748728782848 1 Like on Twitter 1617876748728782848 1 Twitter 1617876748728782848
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
12 Jan

At the end of last year, the High Court ruled that the Home Office's plan to remove some asylum seekers to Rwanda was lawful. Our Elena Musa explains the judgment: https://www.gryklaw.com/high-court-rules-that-rwanda-plan-is-lawful/

Reply on Twitter 1613546026840870913 Retweet on Twitter 1613546026840870913 Like on Twitter 1613546026840870913 Twitter 1613546026840870913
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
13 Dec

Tech Nation, one of the Global Talent endorsing bodies, has recently published a report about Global Talent visas.

Our Alison Hunter explains what this report says, assesses the likely impact on Global Talent applications and summarises the process: https://www.gryklaw.com/global-talent-in-the-uk/

Reply on Twitter 1602725170073976834 Retweet on Twitter 1602725170073976834 Like on Twitter 1602725170073976834 Twitter 1602725170073976834
wesleygrykllp Wesley Gryk LLP @wesleygrykllp ·
6 Dec

Moud Goba (@MsMGoba) has been named in the #BBC100Women 2022 list. Congratulations!
Thoroughly deserved recognition of her work with @MicroRainbow

BBC 100 Women @BBC100women

🚨 The #BBC100Women 2022 list is out 🚨

It features inspiring and influential women from all around the world.

http://bbc.in/3VAGomy

Reply on Twitter 1600085636920262657 Retweet on Twitter 1600085636920262657 1 Like on Twitter 1600085636920262657 8 Twitter 1600085636920262657
Load More
Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP
140 Lower Marsh, London SE1 7AE
Tel 020 7401 6887
Email contact@gryklaw.com

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy

Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with number OC317684. Our registered office is at 140 Lower Marsh, London, SE1 7AE. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA ID 446311.

Copyright © 2023 · Wesley Gryk Solicitors LLP · Website by Culpepper & Co · Photography by Sarah Booker

.