Families applying for immigration permission in the UK will be familiar with the ways in which the Immigration Rules can leave children in uncertain situations. This has been particularly true for children in families where one parent is British or settled and the other has limited leave to remain.
The Home Office’s approach has been that, unless an exception applies, a child should only be granted indefinite leave where both parents have or are being granted settlement. This has meant, for example, that where one parent has been granted leave as a partner under Appendix FM, any non-British children will be granted limited leave in line with that parent, rather than indefinite leave. Children then apply with the non-settled parent for further limited leave and eventually indefinite leave, at significant cost.
A recent Court of Appeal case (R (Kone) v SSHD [2025] EWCA Civ 1653), potentially opens an opportunity for children to apply for indefinite leave much sooner where one parent is British or settled and the other has limited leave. This is on the basis of the Court’s interpretation of a rule which provides that indefinite leave to enter may be granted to a child where:
“one parent or a relative is present and settled in the United Kingdom or being admitted on the same occasion for settlement and there are serious and compelling family or other considerations which make exclusion of the child undesirable and suitable arrangements have been made for the child’s care”
The Court of Appeal held that a child may qualify for indefinite leave to enter under this provision if one parent is settled in the UK and the other has limited leave, provided the child met the other requirements of the rule.
This judgment marks a significant departure from long-standing Home Office practice and strengthens the position of children in mixed status families. As a result, more children may now be eligible for immediate settlement, provided that they can show that there are “serious and compelling family or other considerations which make exclusion of the child undesirable”.
This case has the potential to have a positive impact on some children and young people, particularly teenagers who might otherwise turn 18 before obtaining settlement. However, we understand that the Home Office is seeking to appeal this decision and there is also a risk that the Immigration Rules themselves will be changed to prevent people benefitting from the Court of Appeal judgment.
Every family’s situation is unique. If you would like expert legal advice to establish whether your family might be able to benefit from this judgment, please do not hesitate to contact us at enquiries@gryklaw.com or on 020 7401 6887.



